Status: assessed three ways, all by AI. We are currently creating automated evidence discovery to support the summary audit. The human audit by Brakten Consulting is scheduled for early January 2027.
Our front-page Trust score is 9 out of 10. It comes from three separate assessments that agree closely. All three were run by AI systems. None is yet a human audit.
We publish the score, the method, and the limits of each step so you can judge it yourself.
We scored ourselves against best-practice decision intelligence engines, selected independently by Google. OpenAI ran the assessment and was instructed to be honest.
The dashboard measures relative performance on nine dimensions: Credibility, Ethics, Compliance, Humans-In-Loop, Critical Friends, Living Foresight, Lab Research, Speed, and Cost.
Result: Above 9.0 out of 10
Limit: the system assessed itself. The evidence can be shown, but it is not independent.
A separate system, built with Claude and not tied to the OpenAI evidence gathering. Seven other large language models (LLMs) add further assessments.
Result: Claude 8.8 out of 10. The other LLMs score slightly lower.
Limit: the other LLMs cannot see what Claude sees, so their scores rest on less evidence. All raters are AI.
Phil Volkofsky of Brakten Consulting and Dr Mike Jackson automated Phil's summary audit method.
Result: 8.7 out of 10
Limit: this is Phil's summary audit method run by PreEmpt.Life software only. It is not Phil's independent human audit.
Work in progress: we are currently creating an automated evidence discovery to support the summary audit. It is under construction.
This score is not a human audit. Phil Volkofsky's independent human audit is scheduled for early January 2027.
We will update this page when the evidence discovery is in place and when the human audit is complete.